Centella Asiatica: What “Cica” Really Means for Calm, Barrier-Supported Skin

Centella Asiatica — ingredient library

Quick Note

Centella asiatica — often called Cica — is a medicinal plant rich in triterpenes such as asiaticoside, madecassoside, asiatic acid and madecassic acid. The strongest evidence around Centella is connected to wound healing and recovery, while cosmetic studies also support hydration, barrier-related effects and soothing in some preparations. The important limitation is standardisation: a whole Centella extract is not the same as isolated madecassoside, and two products listing “Centella Asiatica Extract” may deliver very different triterpene levels. For Fairywren, the most accurate takeaway is simple: Cica can be a useful supporting active, but the raw-material specification and complete formula determine what the label can reasonably promise.

Jump to a section

Centella, Cica, Gotu Kola — what are we actually talking about?

Centella asiatica is a creeping herb from the Apiaceae family. In traditional use it is known by names such as Gotu Kola or Indian pennywort. “Cica” is a modern skincare shorthand for Centella asiatica; it is not a separate botanical species and it is not a precise INCI ingredient name.

On an ingredient list you may see Centella Asiatica Extract, Centella Asiatica Leaf Extract, isolated Madecassoside, Asiaticoside, Asiatic Acid or Madecassic Acid. Those names matter because they do not describe the same raw material.

That is the first rule for reading Cica skincare: the marketing word may be the same, while the chemistry can be very different.

The four triterpenes behind the Cica story

The best-known Centella triterpenes are asiaticoside, madecassoside, asiatic acid and madecassic acid. Asiaticoside and madecassoside are glycosides — they carry sugar groups — while asiatic acid and madecassic acid are the corresponding aglycones.

These compounds are heavily studied because they can influence inflammatory signalling, collagen-related processes, oxidative stress and wound-repair pathways in experimental models. But a whole Centella extract can contain these compounds in different proportions, plus flavonoids, phenolics and other plant constituents.

That makes “Centella” more like a botanical system than a single active molecule.

“Cica” is not one molecule — asiaticoside, madecassoside, asiatic acid and madecassic acid

Where Centella actually earns its place in skincare

For everyday skincare, the most defensible roles are soothing support, hydration/barrier support and recovery support. Human cosmetic studies have reported improvements in skin hydration, TEWL and irritation-related measurements with selected Centella-containing formulations.

Centella-derived triterpenes also have substantial wound-healing and mechanistic literature. That research helps explain why the ingredient is interesting, but it should not be converted into an unlimited “skin repair” claim for every serum or moisturizer.

The useful consumer interpretation is that Centella can make a formula feel and function more supportive when skin is dry, irritated or stressed — especially when paired with humectants and barrier lipids.

What does human research show?

A 2016 human study tested cosmetic cream and hydrogel formulations containing 2.5% or 5% Centella asiatica extract for four weeks in 25 volunteers. The 5% preparations produced the strongest improvements in hydration, TEWL and a methyl-nicotinate irritation model. This supports cosmetic use, but it does not establish 5% as a universal optimum because the result belongs to the specific extracts and vehicles tested.

A double-blind trial in 30 Indonesian batik workers compared a Centella cream with a ceramide cream over four weeks. Both approaches improved selected hydration/barrier measurements, with no significant difference in overall effectiveness between the groups.

For wrinkle-related outcomes, a 2020 systematic review included five double-blind randomized trials involving 172 Asian women. The review reported improvements in some lip and periorbital wrinkle measures, but also highlighted weak reporting and the lack of standardized Centella preparations — a major limit for broad generalization.

A separate six-month randomized double-blind study used 0.1% madecassoside together with 5% vitamin C in photoaged skin and reported improvements in wrinkles, firmness, roughness and hydration. Because it was a combination formula, those outcomes cannot be attributed to madecassoside alone.

Wound-healing evidence is not the same as a cosmetic claim

This is where Centella marketing most often loses scientific discipline. Systematic and recent reviews describe promising effects of Centella preparations on wound contraction, re-epithelialization, collagen-related processes and recovery in several wound contexts.

That does not mean a cosmetic serum has been proven to heal acne scars, treat burns or replace medical wound care. Wound studies may use pharmaceutical preparations, standardized triterpene fractions, different concentrations, special delivery systems or clinical settings that have little in common with a daily cosmetic product.

Fairywren rule: use wound-healing research to understand biology — not to manufacture a stronger cosmetic claim than the finished product has earned.

Where the evidence is strongest — and where claims stretch: human clinical evidence, human cosmetic evidence, mechanistic evidence, claims caution

Does Centella really soothe visible redness?

Centella’s soothing reputation has a plausible basis. Experimental studies show that its triterpenes can influence inflammatory signalling, and human cosmetic studies have reported anti-inflammatory or redness-related improvements with selected formulations.

Madecassoside, for example, has been studied in cell models for inflammatory signalling and skin-hydration pathways. But a cell study is mechanistic evidence, not proof that any madecassoside serum will visibly reduce redness in every user.

For cosmetic wording, “helps soothe,” “supports skin comfort” and “helps reduce the look of irritation-related redness” are more defensible than saying Centella treats dermatitis, rosacea or acne inflammation.

What about hydration and the skin barrier?

Centella is not a ceramide and should not be described as a direct replacement for the lipids that build the barrier. Its barrier relevance is broader: some human studies report improved stratum-corneum hydration and reduced TEWL with Centella-containing preparations, while mechanistic work suggests selected triterpenes can influence epidermal proteins and hydration-related pathways.

That makes Centella particularly useful inside a barrier-intelligent formula when it is combined with humectants, emollients and — where appropriate — ceramides, cholesterol and fatty acids.

The strongest wording is therefore not “Centella repairs the barrier by itself.” It is “Centella can support a calmer, better-hydrated skin environment within a well-built formula.”

Collagen and anti-ageing claims: what can we really say?

Centella triterpenes have collagen-related mechanistic evidence, and wound-healing research frequently discusses fibroblasts and collagen synthesis. Human wrinkle trials also suggest some cosmetic potential.

But the familiar marketing jump — “Centella boosts collagen, therefore it erases wrinkles” — is too simple. The best-known six-month study paired madecassoside with 5% vitamin C, while the broader wrinkle literature suffers from inconsistent standardisation.

A responsible consumer claim is that Centella and selected triterpenes have promising skin-recovery and wrinkle-related evidence. It is not enough to promise retinoid-like anti-ageing results from an undefined botanical extract.

Whole extract vs madecassoside: why standardisation matters

A whole Centella extract may be water-based, hydroalcoholic, glycolic, dry, concentrated, diluted in glycerin or standardised to a triterpene fraction. The INCI name alone often does not reveal how much madecassoside or asiaticoside the finished product actually delivers.

That is why 1% Centella Asiatica Extract cannot be directly compared with 0.3% madecassoside. One is a botanical mixture; the other is a defined constituent.

For formulation transparency, useful supplier data include the plant part, extraction solvent, extract ratio, carrier and guaranteed triterpene/marker content. Without those details, the headline percentage can look more informative than it really is.

Does a higher Centella percentage mean more?

Not automatically. In one human cosmetic study, 5% extract performed better than the lower concentration tested, but that result belongs to the specific Centella raw material and formula used.

A standardized madecassoside formula can be biologically meaningful at a fraction of the percentage used for a whole extract. Geek & Gorgeous, for example, communicates 0.3% isolated madecassoside — a very different proposition from a product saying “5% Cica extract.”

The practical rule is the same one Fairywren uses across actives: percentage matters only after you know exactly what the percentage refers to.

Who may benefit from Centella?

Centella is most relevant to skin that is dry, dehydrated, easily irritated or recovering from an aggressive routine. It can also be useful as a supporting ingredient around retinoids, exfoliating acids or pigmentation actives when the goal is to improve routine comfort.

It is not restricted to one skin type. Oily and acne-prone skin can use Centella in a lightweight vehicle; dry skin may benefit from Centella inside a richer formula with humectants and lipids.

Sensitive skin often tolerates Centella well, but botanical does not mean allergy-proof. Cosmetic-safety assessment supports current uses when products are formulated to be non-sensitizing.

How to use it

Centella can generally be used in the morning, evening or both because it is not inherently photosensitising. The correct step depends on the product: watery essences and serums go before creams; Centella-containing moisturizers go later in the routine.

Most people do not need to cycle Centella or separate it from common actives. It is often used precisely because it fits alongside stronger ingredients.

If the skin is actively irritated, the more important decision is to simplify the whole routine. Adding a “soothing” serum on top of several irritating actives does not make the routine barrier-intelligent.

What can you pair it with?

Centella has no well-established ‘never mix’ list. It can be used with niacinamide, panthenol, hyaluronic acid, glycerin, ceramides, tranexamic acid, azelaic acid, vitamin C, retinoids and exfoliating acids.

The useful distinction is cumulative irritation. Centella may support comfort, but it does not cancel out the irritation potential of a harsh routine.

Good barrier-intelligent pairings include Centella plus humectants for hydration, Centella plus ceramides/lipids for barrier support, or Centella plus a targeted active when the formula needs a soothing counterbalance.

What Centella cannot do

Centella cannot guarantee scar removal. It does not replace medical wound care. It does not prove that a product treats eczema, rosacea or acne. It does not become more effective simply because a brand uses the word “Cica” prominently.

And a whole Centella extract should not borrow every claim ever demonstrated for madecassoside, asiaticoside or a pharmaceutical triterpene fraction.

Common myths

Claim: “Cica is a different ingredient from Centella asiatica.”

Verdict: Not really. Cica is skincare shorthand for Centella asiatica or its derivatives; the actual INCI tells you what the formula contains.

Claim: “More Centella always means better results.”

Verdict: No. Whole-extract percentages are not directly comparable with isolated or standardized triterpenes such as madecassoside.

Claim: “Centella heals acne scars.”

Verdict: Too strong. Centella has wound-healing and collagen-related research, but that does not prove an ordinary cosmetic will remove established acne scars.

Claim: “Centella repairs the skin barrier like ceramides.”

Verdict: Not in the same way. Ceramides are structural barrier lipids; Centella can support hydration, comfort and recovery but is not a structural ceramide replacement.

Claim: “If it is natural, it cannot irritate sensitive skin.”

Verdict: False. Centella-derived cosmetic ingredients are generally well tolerated, but botanical extracts can still cause individual sensitivity.

FAQ

Is Cica the same as Centella asiatica?

Cica is the common skincare nickname. Check the INCI to see whether the product contains whole Centella extract, madecassoside, asiaticoside, asiatic acid or another derivative.

Is Centella good for the skin barrier?

It can support hydration, skin comfort and barrier-related measurements in some formulations, but it is not a structural barrier lipid like a ceramide.

Is madecassoside better than Centella extract?

Not universally. Madecassoside gives a more defined dose and evidence target; a whole extract contains a broader mixture of constituents. Which is better depends on the formula and goal.

Can Centella be used with retinol?

Yes. There is no established incompatibility, and Centella is often used in routines with retinoids because of its soothing/supportive profile.

Can Centella be used with vitamin C?

Yes. The two are compatible in routine use. A classic human study even used madecassoside together with 5% vitamin C, although the result belongs to the combination.

Can Centella help with redness?

It may help reduce the look of irritation-related redness in some formulas. It should not be presented as a treatment for rosacea or other medical causes of redness.

Can acne-prone skin use Centella?

Usually, yes. The finished product’s texture and comedogenic potential matter more than Centella itself. Centella is not an acne treatment on its own.

How long does Centella take to work?

Hydration or comfort can change relatively quickly, while barrier and wrinkle-related studies usually evaluate repeated use over weeks. Timelines depend on the extract and formula.

Is Centella safe for sensitive skin?

Centella-derived cosmetic ingredients are generally considered safe in current cosmetic use when formulated to be non-sensitizing, but individual reactions remain possible.

What percentage of Centella is best?

There is no universal best percentage because extract strength and standardisation vary. A defined madecassoside percentage and a whole-extract percentage are not directly comparable.

SCIENTIFIC REFERENCES


  1. Bylka W, Znajdek-Awiżeń P, Studzińska-Sroka E, Dańczak-Pazdrowska A, Brzezińska M. Centella asiatica in dermatology: an overview. Phytotherapy Research. 2014;28(8):1117-1124. DOI: 10.1002/ptr.5110. PMID: 24399761. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24399761/
  2. Arribas-López E, Zand N, Ojo O, Snowden MJ, Kochhar T. A Systematic Review of the Effect of Centella asiatica on Wound Healing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(6):3266. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063266. PMID: 35328954. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35328954/
  3. Ratz-Łyko A, Arct J, Pytkowska K. Moisturizing and Antiinflammatory Properties of Cosmetic Formulations Containing Centella asiatica Extract. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2016;78(1):27-33. DOI: 10.4103/0250-474X.180247. PMID: 27168678. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27168678/
  4. Haftek M, Mac-Mary S, Le Bitoux MA, et al. Clinical, biometric and structural evaluation of the long-term effects of a topical treatment with ascorbic acid and madecassoside in photoaged human skin. Experimental Dermatology. 2008;17(11):946-952. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2008.00732.x. PMID: 18503551. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18503551/
  5. Anggraeni S, Umborowati MA, Damayanti, Endaryanto A, Prakoeswa CRS. Role of Centella asiatica and ceramide in skin barrier improvement: a double blind clinical trial of Indonesian batik workers. Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology. 2021;32(4):589-593. DOI: 10.1515/jbcpp-2020-0510. PMID: 34214362. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34214362/
  6. Kongkaew C, Meesomperm P, Scholfield CN, Chaiwiang N, Waranuch N. Efficacy and Safety of Centella Asiatica (L.) Urb. on Wrinkles: A Systematic Review of Published Data and Network Meta-Analysis. Journal of Cosmetic Science. 2020;71(6):439-454. PMID: 33413787. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33413787/
  7. Burnett CL, Fiume MM, Bergfeld WF, et al. Safety Assessment of Centella asiatica-Derived Ingredients as Used in Cosmetics. International Journal of Toxicology. 2023. DOI: 10.1177/10915818231158272. PMID: 36812692. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36812692/
  8. Shen X, et al. Propionibacterium acnes related anti-inflammation and skin hydration activities of madecassoside, a pentacyclic triterpene saponin from Centella asiatica. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry. 2019;83(3):561-568. DOI: 10.1080/09168451.2018.1547627. PMID: 30452312. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30452312/
  9. Witkowska K, Paczkowska-Walendowska M, Garbiec E, Cielecka-Piontek J. Topical Application of Centella asiatica in Wound Healing: Recent Insights into Mechanisms and Clinical Efficacy. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(10):1252. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16101252. PMID: 39458583. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39458583/
  10. Park KS, et al. Pharmacological Effects of Centella asiatica on Skin Diseases: Evidence and Possible Mechanisms. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2021. PMID: 34845411. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34845411/
  11. Milani M, Sparavigna A. The 24-hour skin hydration and barrier function effects of a hyaluronic 1%, glycerin 5%, and Centella asiatica stem cells extract moisturizing fluid: an intra-subject, randomized, assessor-blinded study. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology. 2017;10:311-315. DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S144180. PMID: 28860834. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28860834/
  12. The Effectiveness and Safety of a Skin Care Product With Centella asiatica Leaf Extract, Ceramide NP, and Panthenol in Subjects With Sensitive Skin: A Prospective, Observational Study. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2025. PMID: 40682399. Note: finished multi-active product; cannot isolate the Centella contribution. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40682399/